Demographics details for Clayton, OK vs Buckner, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OK vs Buckner, KY.
| Data | Clayton | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 555 | 3,658 |
| Median Age | 32.7 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $27,083 | $141,538 |
| Married Families | 31.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Buckner
- The population in Buckner is higher at 3,658, compared to 555 in Clayton.
- The median age in Buckner is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 32.7 years in Clayton.
- Buckner has a higher median income of $141,538, compared to $27,083 in Clayton.
- In Buckner, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 31.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clayton and Buckner at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Buckner.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Buckner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 6 |
| White | 51 | 84 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 23 | 6 |
| American Indian | 20 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Buckner
- In Buckner, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Buckner at 84% compared to 51% in Clayton.
- Both Clayton and Buckner have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Clayton and Buckner at 4%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 23% compared to 6% in Buckner.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clayton at 20% compared to 0% in Buckner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.5% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 28.8% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 26.6% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.4% | 19.0% |
| Obesity | 40.2% | 33.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 37.0% | 5.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Buckner
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 21.5% compared to 14.3% in Buckner.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 28.8% compared to 21.0% in Buckner.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 26.6% compared to 17.3% in Buckner.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Buckner at 19.0% compared to 14.4% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 40.2% compared to 33.8% in Buckner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 37.0% compared to 5.0% in Buckner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Buckner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 37.5% (208) | 3.3% (121) |
| Less than High School | 19.5% (108) | 8.7% (320) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 6.7% (37) | 36.6% (1,339) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Buckner
- In Buckner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 37.5% compared to 3.3% in Buckner.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 19.5% compared to 8.7% in Buckner.
- In Buckner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.6% compared to 6.7% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.