Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Yonkers, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Yonkers, NY.
| Data | Clayton | Yonkers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 208,121 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $78,208 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Yonkers
- The population in Yonkers is higher at 208,121, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 39.1 years in Yonkers.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $78,208 in Yonkers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 36.0% in Yonkers.
- The poverty level is higher in Yonkers at 11%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- Yonkers has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Yonkers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Yonkers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 19 |
| White | 61 | 20 |
| Asian | 2 | 6 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 42 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Yonkers
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 19% in Yonkers.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 20% in Yonkers.
- In Yonkers, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 2% in Clayton.
- Yonkers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 42%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yonkers at 12%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- In Yonkers, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Yonkers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 18.6% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 14.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 30.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Yonkers
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.7% in Yonkers.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 18.6% in Yonkers.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.3% compared to 14.5% in Yonkers.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 15.2% in Yonkers.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 30.8% in Yonkers.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clayton and Yonkers at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Yonkers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 2.3% (4,882) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 14.4% (29,957) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 20.5% (42,702) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 25.0% (52,112) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Yonkers
- In Yonkers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 14.4% in Yonkers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Yonkers at 20.5%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 25.0% in Yonkers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.