Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Union grove, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Union grove, AL.
| Data | Clayton | Union grove |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 69 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 52.9 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $81,875 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Union grove
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 13,235, compared to 69 in Union grove.
- The median age in Union grove is higher at 52.9 years, compared to 46.0 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $81,875 in Union grove.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 28.0% in Union grove.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Union grove.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clayton and Union grove at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Union grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Union grove |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 95 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Union grove
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 1% in Union grove.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Union grove at 95% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clayton at 2% compared to 0% in Union grove.
- Union grove has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 1% in Union grove.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Union grove at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Union grove |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 22.6% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 15.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.1% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 31.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 33.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Union grove
- In Union grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.9% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 22.6% in Union grove.
- Union grove has a higher smoking rate at 15.7% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 18.1% in Union grove.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 31.4% in Union grove.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Union grove at 33.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Union grove |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 40.6% (28) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 11.6% (8) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Union grove
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- In Union grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 40.6% compared to 17.9% in Clayton.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 5.6% compared to 0.0% in Union grove.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 11.6% in Union grove.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.