Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Taylorsville, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Taylorsville, GA.
| Data | Clayton | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 258 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 56.7 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $41,250 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 62.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Taylorsville
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 13,235, compared to 258 in Taylorsville.
- The median age in Taylorsville is higher at 56.7 years, compared to 46.0 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $41,250 in Taylorsville.
- In Taylorsville, the percentage of married families is higher at 62.0%, compared to 47.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clayton and Taylorsville at 10%.
- Taylorsville has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Taylorsville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 82 |
| Asian | 2 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Taylorsville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 1% in Taylorsville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Taylorsville at 82% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- In Taylorsville, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 2% in Clayton.
- Taylorsville has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Taylorsville at 7%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Taylorsville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 17.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 32.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 40.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.7% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 24.1% in Taylorsville.
- Taylorsville has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 17.0% in Taylorsville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 32.5% in Taylorsville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Taylorsville at 40.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Taylorsville |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.8% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 24.8% (64) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 51.2% (132) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 22.5% (58) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Taylorsville
- In Taylorsville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- In Taylorsville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.8% compared to 17.9% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Taylorsville at 51.2%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 22.5% in Taylorsville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.