Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Tamaroa, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Tamaroa, IL.
| Data | Clayton | Tamaroa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 536 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 42.7 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $47,500 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Tamaroa
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 13,235, compared to 536 in Tamaroa.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 42.7 years in Tamaroa.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $47,500 in Tamaroa.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 30.0% in Tamaroa.
- The poverty level is higher in Tamaroa at 12%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- Tamaroa has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Tamaroa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Tamaroa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | Data is updating |
| White | 61 | 100 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Tamaroa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Tamaroa at 100% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clayton at 2% compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 2% compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 0% in Tamaroa.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Tamaroa at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Tamaroa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 35.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 31.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Tamaroa
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.4% in Tamaroa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 22.2% in Tamaroa.
- Tamaroa has a higher smoking rate at 17.5% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 18.7% in Tamaroa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 35.3% in Tamaroa.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tamaroa at 31.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Tamaroa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.2% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 23.1% (124) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 19.4% (104) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 4.9% (26) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Tamaroa
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clayton and Tamaroa at 0.2%.
- In Tamaroa, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.1% compared to 17.9% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tamaroa at 19.4%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 4.9% in Tamaroa.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.