Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Roaring river, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Roaring river, NC.
| Data | Clayton | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 1,000 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 35.0 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 500.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Roaring river
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 13,235, compared to 1,000 in Roaring river.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 35.0 years in Roaring river.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $60,000 in Roaring river.
- In Roaring river, the percentage of married families is higher at 500.0%, compared to 47.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is higher in Roaring river at 12%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- Roaring river has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Roaring river provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 5 |
| White | 61 | 90 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Roaring river
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 5% in Roaring river.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Roaring river at 90% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- Both Clayton and Roaring river have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Clayton and Roaring river at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 1% in Roaring river.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Roaring river at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 24.4% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Roaring river
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Roaring river |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Roaring river
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 5.6% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 0.0% in Roaring river.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.