Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Pocatello, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Pocatello, ID.
Data | Clayton | Pocatello |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,235 | 57,730 |
Median Age | 46.0 years | 32.9 years |
Median Income | $89,282 | $56,115 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Pocatello
- The population in Pocatello is higher at 57,730, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 32.9 years in Pocatello.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $56,115 in Pocatello.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 35.0% in Pocatello.
- The poverty level is higher in Pocatello at 15%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- Pocatello has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Pocatello provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clayton | Pocatello |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | 1 |
White | 61 | 81 |
Asian | 2 | 2 |
Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Pocatello
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 1% in Pocatello.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Pocatello at 81% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- Both Clayton and Pocatello have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Pocatello has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pocatello at 6%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- In Pocatello, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clayton | Pocatello |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 12.2% |
Depression | 24.4% | 24.3% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 14.0% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 38.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Pocatello
- In Pocatello, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.5% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 24.3% in Pocatello.
- Pocatello has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 14.0% in Pocatello.
- Pocatello has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 37.4% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pocatello at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clayton | Pocatello |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.3% (164) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 11.7% (6,767) |
Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 7.9% (4,589) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 19.5% (11,240) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Pocatello
- In Pocatello, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 11.7% in Pocatello.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pocatello at 7.9%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 19.5% in Pocatello.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.