Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Peachtree corners, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Peachtree corners, GA.

Data Clayton Peachtree corners
Population 13,235 42,133
Median Age 46.0 years 35.5 years
Median Income $89,282 $74,716
Married Families 47.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 10% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.1

Population Comparison: Clayton vs Peachtree corners

  • The population in Peachtree corners is higher at 42,133, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
  • Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 35.5 years in Peachtree corners.
  • Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $74,716 in Peachtree corners.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 41.0% in Peachtree corners.
  • Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Peachtree corners.
  • The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.1% in Peachtree corners.

Demographics

Demographics Clayton vs Peachtree corners provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clayton Peachtree corners
Black 30 24
White 61 43
Asian 2 8
Hispanic 2 17
Two or More Races 5 7
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Peachtree corners

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 24% in Peachtree corners.
  • Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 43% in Peachtree corners.
  • In Peachtree corners, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 2% in Clayton.
  • Peachtree corners has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Peachtree corners at 7%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
  • In Peachtree corners, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clayton Peachtree corners
Mental Health Not Good 16.8% 13.0%
Physical Health Not Good 10.3% 8.5%
Depression 24.4% 16.7%
Smoking 15.3% 10.6%
Binge Drinking 18.9% 14.9%
Obesity 37.4% 29.0%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 4.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Peachtree corners

  • More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.0% in Peachtree corners.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 16.7% in Peachtree corners.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.3% compared to 10.6% in Peachtree corners.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 14.9% in Peachtree corners.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 29.0% in Peachtree corners.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 4.0% in Peachtree corners.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clayton Peachtree corners
No Schooling 0.2% (30) 0.4% (150)
High School Diploma 17.9% (2,371) 10.7% (4,527)
Less than High School 5.6% (746) 8.3% (3,491)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 26.3% (3,484) 34.2% (14,398)

Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Peachtree corners

  • In Peachtree corners, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 10.7% in Peachtree corners.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Peachtree corners at 8.3%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
  • In Peachtree corners, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.2% compared to 26.3% in Clayton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.