Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Livingston, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Livingston, AL.
| Data | Clayton | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 3,205 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 21.2 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $20,417 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 19.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 27% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Livingston
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 13,235, compared to 3,205 in Livingston.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 21.2 years in Livingston.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $20,417 in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 19.0% in Livingston.
- The poverty level is higher in Livingston at 27%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- Livingston has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Livingston provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 58 |
| White | 61 | 38 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Livingston
- In Livingston, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 30% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 38% in Livingston.
- The Asian population is larger in Clayton at 2% compared to 1% in Livingston.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 2% compared to 1% in Livingston.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 2% in Livingston.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Livingston at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 12.3% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 46.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Livingston
- In Livingston, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 22.0% in Livingston.
- Livingston has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 12.3% in Livingston.
- Livingston has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 37.4% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Livingston at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Livingston |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 7.7% (248) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 2.3% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 15.5% (496) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Livingston
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 7.7% in Livingston.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 5.6% compared to 2.3% in Livingston.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 15.5% in Livingston.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.