Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Groom, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Groom, TX.
Data | Clayton | Groom |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,235 | 548 |
Median Age | 46.0 years | 46.0 years |
Median Income | $89,282 | $51,944 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Groom
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 13,235, compared to 548 in Groom.
- The median age is the same in both Clayton and Groom at 46.0 years.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $51,944 in Groom.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 39.0% in Groom.
- The poverty level is higher in Groom at 12%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clayton and Groom at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Groom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clayton | Groom |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | Data is updating |
White | 61 | 96 |
Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 2 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Groom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 0% in Groom.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Groom at 96% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clayton at 2% compared to 0% in Groom.
- Groom has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 1% in Groom.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Groom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clayton | Groom |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.6% |
Depression | 24.4% | 25.1% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 16.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 20.3% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 34.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Groom
- In Groom, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Groom at 25.1% versus 24.4% in Clayton.
- Groom has a higher smoking rate at 16.4% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Groom at 20.3% compared to 18.9% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 34.7% in Groom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Groom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clayton | Groom |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.7% (4) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 22.3% (122) |
Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 10.9% (60) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 10.9% (60) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Groom
- In Groom, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- In Groom, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 17.9% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Groom at 10.9%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 10.9% in Groom.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.