Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Durand, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Durand, IL.
| Data | Clayton | Durand |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 1,375 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $59,970 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Durand
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 13,235, compared to 1,375 in Durand.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 38.3 years in Durand.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $59,970 in Durand.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 42.0% in Durand.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Durand.
- Durand has a higher unemployment rate at 4.1% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Durand provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Durand |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 2 |
| White | 61 | 92 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Durand
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 2% in Durand.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Durand at 92% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clayton at 2% compared to 1% in Durand.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Clayton and Durand at 2%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 3% in Durand.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Durand at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Durand |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.9% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 20.9% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 37.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Durand
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.2% in Durand.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 20.9% in Durand.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.3% compared to 15.2% in Durand.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 18.7% in Durand.
- Durand has higher obesity rates at 37.5% compared to 37.4% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Durand at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Durand |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 23.0% (316) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 11.8% (162) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 12.1% (166) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Durand
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Durand.
- In Durand, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 17.9% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Durand at 11.8%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 12.1% in Durand.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.