Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Covington, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Covington, WA.
| Data | Clayton | Covington |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 21,374 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 38.6 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $123,065 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 45.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Covington
- The population in Covington is higher at 21,374, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 38.6 years in Covington.
- Covington has a higher median income of $123,065, compared to $89,282 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 45.0% in Covington.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 5% in Covington.
- Covington has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Covington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Covington |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 6 |
| White | 61 | 63 |
| Asian | 2 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Covington
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 6% in Covington.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Covington at 63% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- In Covington, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 2% in Clayton.
- Covington has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Covington at 11%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Covington at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Covington |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 9.6% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 11.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 25.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Covington
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Clayton and Covington at 16.8%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Covington at 25.6% versus 24.4% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.3% compared to 11.1% in Covington.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 18.7% in Covington.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 25.2% in Covington.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Covington.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Covington |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.6% (130) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 12.7% (2,719) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 6.1% (1,308) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 22.0% (4,703) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Covington
- In Covington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 12.7% in Covington.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Covington at 6.1%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 22.0% in Covington.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.