Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Costa mesa, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Costa mesa, CA.
| Data | Clayton | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 109,521 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $104,981 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Costa mesa
- The population in Costa mesa is higher at 109,521, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 36.4 years in Costa mesa.
- Costa mesa has a higher median income of $104,981, compared to $89,282 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 36.0% in Costa mesa.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Costa mesa.
- Costa mesa has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Costa mesa provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 40 |
| Asian | 2 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 37 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Costa mesa
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 1% in Costa mesa.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 40% in Costa mesa.
- In Costa mesa, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Clayton.
- Costa mesa has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Costa mesa at 12%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- In Costa mesa, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 18.5% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 10.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 17.1% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 27.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Costa mesa
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.2% in Costa mesa.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 18.5% in Costa mesa.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.3% compared to 10.9% in Costa mesa.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 17.1% in Costa mesa.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 27.6% in Costa mesa.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Costa mesa.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Costa mesa |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 1.8% (2,006) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 11.3% (12,406) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 17.3% (18,969) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 31.2% (34,140) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Costa mesa
- In Costa mesa, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 11.3% in Costa mesa.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Costa mesa at 17.3%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- In Costa mesa, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.2% compared to 26.3% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.