Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Cosmopolis, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Cosmopolis, WA.
Data | Clayton | Cosmopolis |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,235 | 1,667 |
Median Age | 46.0 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $89,282 | $69,625 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 58.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Cosmopolis
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 13,235, compared to 1,667 in Cosmopolis.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 40.2 years in Cosmopolis.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $69,625 in Cosmopolis.
- In Cosmopolis, the percentage of married families is higher at 58.0%, compared to 47.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clayton and Cosmopolis at 10%.
- Cosmopolis has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Cosmopolis provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clayton | Cosmopolis |
---|---|---|
Black | 30 | Data is updating |
White | 61 | 62 |
Asian | 2 | 9 |
Hispanic | 2 | 13 |
Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Cosmopolis
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 0% in Cosmopolis.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cosmopolis at 62% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- In Cosmopolis, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 2% in Clayton.
- Cosmopolis has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cosmopolis at 15%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- In Cosmopolis, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clayton | Cosmopolis |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 20.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 14.4% |
Depression | 24.4% | 30.6% |
Smoking | 15.3% | 20.1% |
Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 16.1% |
Obesity | 37.4% | 35.3% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Cosmopolis
- In Cosmopolis, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cosmopolis at 30.6% versus 24.4% in Clayton.
- Cosmopolis has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 16.1% in Cosmopolis.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 35.3% in Cosmopolis.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cosmopolis at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clayton | Cosmopolis |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 23.0% (384) |
Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 15.5% (258) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 16.6% (276) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Cosmopolis
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Cosmopolis.
- In Cosmopolis, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 17.9% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cosmopolis at 15.5%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 16.6% in Cosmopolis.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.