Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Conyers, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Conyers, GA.
| Data | Clayton | Conyers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 17,926 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 37.7 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $53,500 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Conyers
- The population in Conyers is higher at 17,926, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 37.7 years in Conyers.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $89,282 compared to $53,500 in Conyers.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 47.0% compared to 21.0% in Conyers.
- The poverty level is higher in Conyers at 14%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- Conyers has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Conyers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Conyers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 62 |
| White | 61 | 22 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Conyers
- In Conyers, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 62% compared to 30% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 22% in Conyers.
- Both Clayton and Conyers have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Conyers has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 4% in Conyers.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Conyers at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Conyers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 18.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 19.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 42.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Conyers
- In Conyers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.2% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 24.4% compared to 20.1% in Conyers.
- Conyers has a higher smoking rate at 19.4% compared to 15.3% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 12.8% in Conyers.
- Conyers has higher obesity rates at 42.8% compared to 37.4% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Conyers.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Conyers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 1.1% (204) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 14.8% (2,660) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 12.1% (2,169) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 17.4% (3,117) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Conyers
- In Conyers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 14.8% in Conyers.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Conyers at 12.1%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 17.4% in Conyers.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.