Demographics details for Clayton, OH vs Canby, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, OH vs Canby, OR.
| Data | Clayton | Canby |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,235 | 18,074 |
| Median Age | 46.0 years | 41.1 years |
| Median Income | $89,282 | $91,823 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Canby
- The population in Canby is higher at 18,074, compared to 13,235 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.0 years compared to 41.1 years in Canby.
- Canby has a higher median income of $91,823, compared to $89,282 in Clayton.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Clayton and Canby at 47.0%.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Canby.
- Canby has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Canby provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Canby |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 30 | 1 |
| White | 61 | 69 |
| Asian | 2 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Canby
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 30% compared to 1% in Canby.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Canby at 69% compared to 61% in Clayton.
- Both Clayton and Canby have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
- Canby has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 2% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Canby at 9%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- In Canby, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Canby |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.3% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 24.4% | 26.5% |
| Smoking | 15.3% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.9% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 37.4% | 33.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Canby
- In Canby, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 16.8% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Canby at 26.5% versus 24.4% in Clayton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.3% compared to 14.4% in Canby.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 18.9% compared to 18.6% in Canby.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 37.4% compared to 33.8% in Canby.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Canby at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Canby |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (30) | 1.4% (248) |
| High School Diploma | 17.9% (2,371) | 15.5% (2,794) |
| Less than High School | 5.6% (746) | 13.7% (2,480) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 26.3% (3,484) | 20.1% (3,636) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Canby
- In Canby, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 17.9% compared to 15.5% in Canby.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Canby at 13.7%, compared to 5.6% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 20.1% in Canby.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.