Demographics details for Clayton, NY vs South pasadena, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NY vs South pasadena, CA.

Data Clayton South pasadena
Population 4,781 25,850
Median Age 46.6 years 40.6 years
Median Income $74,471 $127,882
Married Families 48.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 10% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Clayton vs South pasadena

  • The population in South pasadena is higher at 25,850, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
  • Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 40.6 years in South pasadena.
  • South pasadena has a higher median income of $127,882, compared to $74,471 in Clayton.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 48.0% compared to 45.0% in South pasadena.
  • Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in South pasadena.
  • South pasadena has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Clayton.

Demographics

Demographics Clayton vs South pasadena provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clayton South pasadena
Black Data is updating 4
White 95 31
Asian Data is updating 34
Hispanic 1 19
Two or More Races 4 12
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs South pasadena

  • In South pasadena, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Clayton.
  • Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 31% in South pasadena.
  • In South pasadena, the Asian population stands at 34%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
  • South pasadena has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 1% in Clayton.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South pasadena at 12%, compared to 4% in Clayton.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and South pasadena at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clayton South pasadena
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.9%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 7.1%
Depression Data is updating% 13.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 6.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.3%
Obesity Data is updating% 20.9%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs South pasadena

  • In South pasadena, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in South pasadena at 13.8% versus 0.0% in Clayton.
  • South pasadena has a higher smoking rate at 6.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in South pasadena at 15.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
  • South pasadena has higher obesity rates at 20.9% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in South pasadena.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clayton South pasadena
No Schooling 0.1% (4) 0.7% (177)
High School Diploma 18.3% (874) 4.3% (1,111)
Less than High School 14.2% (679) 3.0% (766)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 20.6% (983) 53.2% (13,751)

Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs South pasadena

  • In South pasadena, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 4.3% in South pasadena.
  • More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 3.0% in South pasadena.
  • In South pasadena, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 53.2% compared to 20.6% in Clayton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.