Demographics details for Clayton, NY vs Shreveport, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NY vs Shreveport, LA.
Data | Clayton | Shreveport |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,781 | 180,153 |
Median Age | 46.6 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $74,471 | $45,967 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 21% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Shreveport
- The population in Shreveport is higher at 180,153, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 37.1 years in Shreveport.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $74,471 compared to $45,967 in Shreveport.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 48.0% compared to 29.0% in Shreveport.
- The poverty level is higher in Shreveport at 21%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- Shreveport has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Shreveport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clayton | Shreveport |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 58 |
White | 95 | 33 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 58% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 33% in Shreveport.
- In Shreveport, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
- Shreveport has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Clayton.
- Both Clayton and Shreveport have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Shreveport at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clayton | Shreveport |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.4% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 24.4% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 24.3% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.2% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 42.5% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Shreveport at 24.4% versus 0.0% in Clayton.
- Shreveport has a higher smoking rate at 24.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shreveport at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Shreveport has higher obesity rates at 42.5% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Shreveport at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clayton | Shreveport |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 1.2% (2,087) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (874) | 18.3% (33,032) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (679) | 11.1% (20,070) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (983) | 18.6% (33,461) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Shreveport
- In Shreveport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- Both cities have the same percentage of residents with high school diplomas at 18.3%.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 11.1% in Shreveport.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 18.6% in Shreveport.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.