Demographics details for Clayton, NY vs Oak lawn, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NY vs Oak lawn, IL.
Data | Clayton | Oak lawn |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,781 | 56,286 |
Median Age | 46.6 years | 41.1 years |
Median Income | $74,471 | $77,221 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 40.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 6% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 6.5 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Oak lawn
- The population in Oak lawn is higher at 56,286, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 41.1 years in Oak lawn.
- Oak lawn has a higher median income of $77,221, compared to $74,471 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 48.0% compared to 40.0% in Oak lawn.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 6% in Oak lawn.
- Oak lawn has a higher unemployment rate at 6.5% compared to 4.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Oak lawn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clayton | Oak lawn |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 8 |
White | 95 | 61 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 21 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Oak lawn
- In Oak lawn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 61% in Oak lawn.
- In Oak lawn, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
- Oak lawn has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 1% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oak lawn at 8%, compared to 4% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Oak lawn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clayton | Oak lawn |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 10.2% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 18.9% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 14.3% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 19.3% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 29.9% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Oak lawn
- In Oak lawn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Oak lawn at 18.9% versus 0.0% in Clayton.
- Oak lawn has a higher smoking rate at 14.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oak lawn at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Oak lawn has higher obesity rates at 29.9% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Oak lawn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clayton | Oak lawn |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 2.0% (1,144) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (874) | 17.8% (10,028) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (679) | 14.3% (8,048) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (983) | 21.2% (11,939) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Oak lawn
- In Oak lawn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 17.8% in Oak lawn.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oak lawn at 14.3%, compared to 14.2% in Clayton.
- In Oak lawn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 20.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.