Demographics details for Clayton, NY vs Mobile, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NY vs Mobile, AL.
| Data | Clayton | Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,781 | 183,289 |
| Median Age | 46.6 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $74,471 | $48,524 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Mobile
- The population in Mobile is higher at 183,289, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 37.6 years in Mobile.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $74,471 compared to $48,524 in Mobile.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 48.0% compared to 30.0% in Mobile.
- The poverty level is higher in Mobile at 21%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Mobile.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Mobile provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 54 |
| White | 95 | 38 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Mobile
- In Mobile, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 54% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 38% in Mobile.
- In Mobile, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
- Mobile has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 1% in Clayton.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 4% compared to 3% in Mobile.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Mobile at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 13.5% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 21.7% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 42.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Mobile
- In Mobile, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mobile at 21.7% versus 0.0% in Clayton.
- Mobile has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mobile at 15.1% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Mobile has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clayton and Mobile at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 0.7% (1,270) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (874) | 18.4% (33,785) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (679) | 9.4% (17,177) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (983) | 20.9% (38,346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Mobile
- In Mobile, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- In Mobile, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 18.3% in Clayton.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 9.4% in Mobile.
- In Mobile, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 20.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.