Demographics details for Clayton, NY vs Malta, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NY vs Malta, MT.
| Data | Clayton | Malta |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,781 | 1,868 |
| Median Age | 46.6 years | 49.6 years |
| Median Income | $74,471 | $60,735 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 49.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Malta
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 4,781, compared to 1,868 in Malta.
- The median age in Malta is higher at 49.6 years, compared to 46.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $74,471 compared to $60,735 in Malta.
- In Malta, the percentage of married families is higher at 49.0%, compared to 48.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clayton and Malta at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.1% in Malta.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Malta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Malta |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 95 | 77 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Malta
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Clayton and Malta at 0%.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 77% in Malta.
- Both Clayton and Malta have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Malta has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Malta at 14%, compared to 4% in Clayton.
- In Malta, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Malta |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.7% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 18.6% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 21.3% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Malta
- In Malta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Malta at 23.6% versus 0.0% in Clayton.
- Malta has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Malta at 21.3% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Malta has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Malta at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Malta |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 0.1% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (874) | 23.8% (444) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (679) | 12.3% (230) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (983) | 19.3% (361) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Malta
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clayton and Malta at 0.1%.
- In Malta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.8% compared to 18.3% in Clayton.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 12.3% in Malta.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 19.3% in Malta.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.