Demographics details for Clayton, NY vs Lula, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NY vs Lula, GA.
| Data | Clayton | Lula |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,781 | 2,963 |
| Median Age | 46.6 years | 38.4 years |
| Median Income | $74,471 | $60,174 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Lula
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 4,781, compared to 2,963 in Lula.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 38.4 years in Lula.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $74,471 compared to $60,174 in Lula.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 48.0% compared to 36.0% in Lula.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Lula.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Lula.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Lula provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Lula |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 4 |
| White | 95 | 74 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Lula
- In Lula, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 74% in Lula.
- In Lula, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
- Lula has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 1% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lula at 11%, compared to 4% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Lula at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Lula |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.8% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 19.1% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.8% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Lula
- In Lula, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lula at 23.2% versus 0.0% in Clayton.
- Lula has a higher smoking rate at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lula at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Lula has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lula at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Lula |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 1.0% (30) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (874) | 18.4% (546) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (679) | 22.6% (670) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (983) | 10.1% (298) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Lula
- In Lula, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- In Lula, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 18.3% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lula at 22.6%, compared to 14.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 10.1% in Lula.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.