Demographics details for Clayton, NY vs Kent, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NY vs Kent, WA.
| Data | Clayton | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,781 | 134,392 |
| Median Age | 46.6 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $74,471 | $86,966 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.6 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Kent
- The population in Kent is higher at 134,392, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 34.7 years in Kent.
- Kent has a higher median income of $86,966, compared to $74,471 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 48.0% compared to 36.0% in Kent.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Kent.
- Kent has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Kent provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 13 |
| White | 95 | 37 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 23 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Kent
- In Kent, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 37% in Kent.
- In Kent, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
- Kent has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 16%, compared to 1% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kent at 10%, compared to 4% in Clayton.
- In Kent, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 11.4% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.8% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 13.6% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 27.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Kent
- In Kent, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kent at 24.8% versus 0.0% in Clayton.
- Kent has a higher smoking rate at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kent at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Kent has higher obesity rates at 27.2% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Kent.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Kent |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 2.1% (2,872) |
| High School Diploma | 18.3% (874) | 14.6% (19,603) |
| Less than High School | 14.2% (679) | 12.9% (17,326) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (983) | 18.5% (24,855) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Kent
- In Kent, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 14.6% in Kent.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 14.2% compared to 12.9% in Kent.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 18.5% in Kent.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.