Demographics details for Clayton, NY vs Fort worth, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NY vs Fort worth, TX.
Data | Clayton | Fort worth |
---|---|---|
Population | 4,781 | 956,709 |
Median Age | 46.6 years | 33.2 years |
Median Income | $74,471 | $72,726 |
Married Families | 48.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Fort worth
- The population in Fort worth is higher at 956,709, compared to 4,781 in Clayton.
- Residents in Clayton have a higher median age of 46.6 years compared to 33.2 years in Fort worth.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $74,471 compared to $72,726 in Fort worth.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 48.0% compared to 35.0% in Fort worth.
- The poverty level is higher in Fort worth at 11%, compared to 10% in Clayton.
- Fort worth has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.5% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Fort worth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clayton | Fort worth |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 19 |
White | 95 | 29 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 1 | 34 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Fort worth
- In Fort worth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 19% compared to 0% in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 29% in Fort worth.
- In Fort worth, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Clayton.
- Fort worth has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 1% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fort worth at 12%, compared to 4% in Clayton.
- In Fort worth, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clayton | Fort worth |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.7% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 22.5% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 16.7% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 16.2% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 36.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Fort worth
- In Fort worth, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fort worth at 22.5% versus 0.0% in Clayton.
- Fort worth has a higher smoking rate at 16.7% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fort worth at 16.2% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Fort worth has higher obesity rates at 36.7% compared to 0.0% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Fort worth.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clayton | Fort worth |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (4) | 1.6% (14,888) |
High School Diploma | 18.3% (874) | 12.9% (123,330) |
Less than High School | 14.2% (679) | 17.7% (168,884) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 20.6% (983) | 19.1% (182,276) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Fort worth
- In Fort worth, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.1% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 18.3% compared to 12.9% in Fort worth.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fort worth at 17.7%, compared to 14.2% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.6% compared to 19.1% in Fort worth.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.