Demographics details for Clayton, NC vs Oakdale, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NC vs Oakdale, CA.
| Data | Clayton | Oakdale |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,445 | 23,176 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $71,698 | $83,110 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Oakdale
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 29,445, compared to 23,176 in Oakdale.
- The median age in Oakdale is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Oakdale has a higher median income of $83,110, compared to $71,698 in Clayton.
- In Oakdale, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is higher in Oakdale at 9%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- Oakdale has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Oakdale provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Oakdale |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 1 |
| White | 59 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Oakdale
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 22% compared to 1% in Oakdale.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of White residents at 59% compared to 49% in Oakdale.
- In Oakdale, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Clayton.
- Oakdale has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 13% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakdale at 15%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- In Oakdale, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clayton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Oakdale |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 11.8% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 14.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Oakdale
- In Oakdale, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 23.1% compared to 22.4% in Oakdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.2% compared to 14.5% in Oakdale.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oakdale at 17.8% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 39.9% compared to 32.9% in Oakdale.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oakdale at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Oakdale |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (210) | 1.0% (222) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,700) | 14.7% (3,396) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (1,598) | 17.9% (4,155) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (5,471) | 13.1% (3,047) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Oakdale
- In Oakdale, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- In Oakdale, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakdale at 17.9%, compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 13.1% in Oakdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.