Demographics details for Clayton, NC vs Medford, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NC vs Medford, MA.
| Data | Clayton | Medford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,445 | 65,399 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 35.4 years |
| Median Income | $71,698 | $114,863 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Medford
- The population in Medford is higher at 65,399, compared to 29,445 in Clayton.
- The median age in Medford is higher at 35.4 years, compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Medford has a higher median income of $114,863, compared to $71,698 in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Medford.
- The poverty level is higher in Medford at 7%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.6% in Medford.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Medford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Medford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 7 |
| White | 59 | 67 |
| Asian | 1 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Medford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 22% compared to 7% in Medford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Medford at 67% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- In Medford, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 13% compared to 8% in Medford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Medford at 7%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Medford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Medford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 14.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 21.1% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 10.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.7% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 25.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Medford
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 14.3% in Medford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 23.1% compared to 21.1% in Medford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.2% compared to 10.6% in Medford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Medford at 18.7% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 39.9% compared to 25.1% in Medford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Medford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Medford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (210) | 0.6% (406) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,700) | 12.5% (8,155) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (1,598) | 7.9% (5,192) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (5,471) | 38.9% (25,424) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Medford
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Medford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 12.5% in Medford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Medford at 7.9%, compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- In Medford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 18.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.