Demographics details for Clayton, NC vs Marlboro, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NC vs Marlboro, NJ.
| Data | Clayton | Marlboro |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,445 | 41,480 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 43.5 years |
| Median Income | $71,698 | $170,357 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 53.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Marlboro
- The population in Marlboro is higher at 41,480, compared to 29,445 in Clayton.
- The median age in Marlboro is higher at 43.5 years, compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Marlboro has a higher median income of $170,357, compared to $71,698 in Clayton.
- In Marlboro, the percentage of married families is higher at 53.0%, compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clayton and Marlboro at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.0% in Marlboro.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Marlboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Marlboro |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 2 |
| White | 59 | 67 |
| Asian | 1 | 22 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Marlboro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 22% compared to 2% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Marlboro at 67% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- In Marlboro, the Asian population stands at 22%, greater than 1% in Clayton.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 13% compared to 5% in Marlboro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 4% in Marlboro.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Marlboro at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Marlboro |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.1% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Marlboro
- More residents in Clayton report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clayton at 23.1% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clayton at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 39.9% compared to 0.0% in Marlboro.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Marlboro.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Marlboro |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (210) | 0.8% (336) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,700) | 8.6% (3,576) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (1,598) | 3.2% (1,348) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (5,471) | 43.0% (17,837) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Marlboro
- In Marlboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a high school diploma at 12.6% compared to 8.6% in Marlboro.
- More residents in Clayton have less than a high school education at 5.4% compared to 3.2% in Marlboro.
- In Marlboro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 43.0% compared to 18.6% in Clayton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.