Demographics details for Clayton, NC vs Manns choice, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NC vs Manns choice, PA.
| Data | Clayton | Manns choice |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,445 | 312 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $71,698 | $47,500 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Manns choice
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 29,445, compared to 312 in Manns choice.
- The median age in Manns choice is higher at 37.1 years, compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698 compared to $47,500 in Manns choice.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 35.0% compared to 34.0% in Manns choice.
- Clayton has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The unemployment rate in Clayton is higher at 3.7%, compared to 3.2% in Manns choice.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Manns choice provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Manns choice |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | Data is updating |
| White | 59 | 97 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 13 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Manns choice
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 22% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Manns choice at 97% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clayton at 1% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 13% compared to 0% in Manns choice.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 3% in Manns choice.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Manns choice at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Manns choice |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 17.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 24.1% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 36.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Manns choice
- In Manns choice, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Manns choice at 24.1% versus 23.1% in Clayton.
- Manns choice has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Manns choice at 18.8% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clayton at 39.9% compared to 36.7% in Manns choice.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clayton at 10.0% compared to 8.0% in Manns choice.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Manns choice |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (210) | 1.0% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,700) | 31.4% (98) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (1,598) | 11.5% (36) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (5,471) | 1.0% (3) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Manns choice
- In Manns choice, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- In Manns choice, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 31.4% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manns choice at 11.5%, compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 1.0% in Manns choice.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.