Demographics details for Clayton, NC vs Central square, NY

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NC vs Central square, NY.

Data Clayton Central square
Population 29,445 1,852
Median Age 32.6 years 41.0 years
Median Income $71,698 $58,824
Married Families 35.0% 45.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.7 4.2

Population Comparison: Clayton vs Central square

  • In Clayton, the population is higher at 29,445, compared to 1,852 in Central square.
  • The median age in Central square is higher at 41.0 years, compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
  • Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698 compared to $58,824 in Central square.
  • In Central square, the percentage of married families is higher at 45.0%, compared to 35.0% in Clayton.
  • The poverty level is higher in Central square at 8%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
  • Central square has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.7% in Clayton.

Demographics

Demographics Clayton vs Central square provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clayton Central square
Black 22 1
White 59 97
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 13 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Central square

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 22% compared to 1% in Central square.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Central square at 97% compared to 59% in Clayton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Clayton at 1% compared to 0% in Central square.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 13% compared to 0% in Central square.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 2% in Central square.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Central square at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clayton Central square
Mental Health Not Good 15.6% 17.8%
Physical Health Not Good 10.4% 11.8%
Depression 23.1% 26.8%
Smoking 15.2% 21.2%
Binge Drinking 17.6% 19.3%
Obesity 39.9% 40.3%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Central square

  • In Central square, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.8% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Central square at 26.8% versus 23.1% in Clayton.
  • Central square has a higher smoking rate at 21.2% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Central square at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Clayton.
  • Central square has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 39.9% in Clayton.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Central square at 18.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clayton Central square
No Schooling 0.7% (210) 0.1% (1)
High School Diploma 12.6% (3,700) 14.2% (263)
Less than High School 5.4% (1,598) 11.0% (204)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.6% (5,471) 19.2% (356)

Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Central square

  • A higher percentage of residents in Clayton have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Central square.
  • In Central square, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Central square at 11.0%, compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
  • In Central square, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.2% compared to 18.6% in Clayton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.