Demographics details for Clayton, NC vs Cambridge, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clayton, NC vs Cambridge, OH.
| Data | Clayton | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 29,445 | 9,985 |
| Median Age | 32.6 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $71,698 | $39,589 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 28.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.7 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clayton vs Cambridge
- In Clayton, the population is higher at 29,445, compared to 9,985 in Cambridge.
- The median age in Cambridge is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698 compared to $39,589 in Cambridge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clayton at 35.0% compared to 28.0% in Cambridge.
- The poverty level is higher in Cambridge at 16%, compared to 5% in Clayton.
- Cambridge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clayton vs Cambridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clayton | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 6 |
| White | 59 | 88 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 13 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clayton vs Cambridge
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clayton at 22% compared to 6% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cambridge at 88% compared to 59% in Clayton.
- The Asian population is larger in Clayton at 1% compared to 0% in Cambridge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clayton at 13% compared to 2% in Cambridge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clayton at 5% compared to 4% in Cambridge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clayton and Cambridge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clayton | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.6% | 20.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.4% | 15.1% |
| Depression | 23.1% | 25.9% |
| Smoking | 15.2% | 26.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.9% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 46.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clayton vs Cambridge
- In Cambridge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.4% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cambridge at 25.9% versus 23.1% in Clayton.
- Cambridge has a higher smoking rate at 26.2% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 16.9% in Cambridge.
- Cambridge has higher obesity rates at 46.4% compared to 39.9% in Clayton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cambridge at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clayton | Cambridge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (210) | 0.7% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 12.6% (3,700) | 25.1% (2,502) |
| Less than High School | 5.4% (1,598) | 17.3% (1,732) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.6% (5,471) | 8.8% (875) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clayton vs Cambridge
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clayton and Cambridge at 0.7%.
- In Cambridge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.1% compared to 12.6% in Clayton.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cambridge at 17.3%, compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clayton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 8.8% in Cambridge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.