Demographics details for Clarksville, VA vs Cedar park, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, VA vs Cedar park, TX.
Data | Clarksville | Cedar park |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,301 | 77,642 |
Median Age | 50.2 years | 37.6 years |
Median Income | $59,375 | $118,903 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 45.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Cedar park
- The population in Cedar park is higher at 77,642, compared to 1,301 in Clarksville.
- Residents in Clarksville have a higher median age of 50.2 years compared to 37.6 years in Cedar park.
- Cedar park has a higher median income of $118,903, compared to $59,375 in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clarksville at 47.0% compared to 45.0% in Cedar park.
- The poverty level is identical in both Clarksville and Cedar park at 5%.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksville is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in Cedar park.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksville vs Cedar park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarksville | Cedar park |
---|---|---|
Black | 20 | 3 |
White | 73 | 55 |
Asian | 2 | 12 |
Hispanic | 2 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 10 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Cedar park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksville at 20% compared to 3% in Cedar park.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 55% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 2% in Clarksville.
- Cedar park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 2% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Cedar park at 10%, compared to 3% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksville and Cedar park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarksville | Cedar park |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.5% | 8.8% |
Depression | 23.7% | 24.1% |
Smoking | 21.5% | 11.0% |
Binge Drinking | 15.2% | 17.9% |
Obesity | 40.5% | 31.0% |
Disability Percentage | 22.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Cedar park
- More residents in Clarksville report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 14.9% in Cedar park.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar park at 24.1% versus 23.7% in Clarksville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksville at 21.5% compared to 11.0% in Cedar park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar park at 17.9% compared to 15.2% in Clarksville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksville at 40.5% compared to 31.0% in Cedar park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksville at 22.0% compared to 8.0% in Cedar park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarksville | Cedar park |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (287) |
High School Diploma | 14.5% (189) | 8.9% (6,896) |
Less than High School | 6.6% (86) | 4.1% (3,156) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 28.7% (374) | 35.8% (27,785) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Cedar park
- In Cedar park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a high school diploma at 14.5% compared to 8.9% in Cedar park.
- More residents in Clarksville have less than a high school education at 6.6% compared to 4.1% in Cedar park.
- In Cedar park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 28.7% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.