Demographics details for Clarksville, TN vs Williamsport, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, TN vs Williamsport, PA.

Data Clarksville Williamsport
Population 176,974 27,403
Median Age 30.1 years 30.3 years
Median Income $62,688 $48,388
Married Families 36.0% 24.0%
Poverty Level 12% 16%
Unemployment Rate 4.3 4.1

Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Williamsport

  • In Clarksville, the population is higher at 176,974, compared to 27,403 in Williamsport.
  • The median age in Williamsport is higher at 30.3 years, compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
  • Clarksville has a higher median income of $62,688 compared to $48,388 in Williamsport.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clarksville at 36.0% compared to 24.0% in Williamsport.
  • The poverty level is higher in Williamsport at 16%, compared to 12% in Clarksville.
  • The unemployment rate in Clarksville is higher at 4.3%, compared to 4.1% in Williamsport.

Demographics

Demographics Clarksville vs Williamsport provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarksville Williamsport
Black 22 14
White 55 75
Asian 3 1
Hispanic 11 3
Two or More Races 9 6
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Williamsport

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksville at 22% compared to 14% in Williamsport.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Williamsport at 75% compared to 55% in Clarksville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Clarksville at 3% compared to 1% in Williamsport.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clarksville at 11% compared to 3% in Williamsport.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clarksville at 9% compared to 6% in Williamsport.
  • In Williamsport, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarksville.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarksville Williamsport
Mental Health Not Good 18.6% 18.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 13.7%
Depression 28.4% 24.6%
Smoking 20.1% 22.7%
Binge Drinking 14.8% 16.2%
Obesity 39.3% 40.4%
Disability Percentage 14.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Williamsport

  • In Williamsport, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 18.6% in Clarksville.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clarksville at 28.4% compared to 24.6% in Williamsport.
  • Williamsport has a higher smoking rate at 22.7% compared to 20.1% in Clarksville.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Williamsport at 16.2% compared to 14.8% in Clarksville.
  • Williamsport has higher obesity rates at 40.4% compared to 39.3% in Clarksville.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Williamsport at 18.0% compared to 14.0% in Clarksville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarksville Williamsport
No Schooling 0.6% (976) 0.7% (186)
High School Diploma 13.7% (24,180) 16.4% (4,487)
Less than High School 5.5% (9,720) 12.8% (3,507)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.7% (29,557) 16.1% (4,416)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Williamsport

  • In Williamsport, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Clarksville.
  • In Williamsport, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.4% compared to 13.7% in Clarksville.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Williamsport at 12.8%, compared to 5.5% in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Williamsport.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.