Demographics details for Clarksville, TN vs Sugar land, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, TN vs Sugar land, TX.
| Data | Clarksville | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176,974 | 109,414 |
| Median Age | 30.1 years | 42.5 years |
| Median Income | $62,688 | $132,247 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 52.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Sugar land
- In Clarksville, the population is higher at 176,974, compared to 109,414 in Sugar land.
- The median age in Sugar land is higher at 42.5 years, compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
- Sugar land has a higher median income of $132,247, compared to $62,688 in Clarksville.
- In Sugar land, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Sugar land.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksville is higher at 4.3%, compared to 4.0% in Sugar land.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksville vs Sugar land provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksville | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 7 |
| White | 55 | 33 |
| Asian | 3 | 39 |
| Hispanic | 11 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Sugar land
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksville at 22% compared to 7% in Sugar land.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 33% in Sugar land.
- In Sugar land, the Asian population stands at 39%, greater than 3% in Clarksville.
- Sugar land has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 11% in Clarksville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarksville at 9% compared to 8% in Sugar land.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksville and Sugar land at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksville | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 7.4% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 16.9% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 25.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Sugar land
- More residents in Clarksville report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 12.5% in Sugar land.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksville at 28.4% compared to 16.9% in Sugar land.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksville at 20.1% compared to 9.6% in Sugar land.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sugar land at 16.0% compared to 14.8% in Clarksville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksville at 39.3% compared to 25.0% in Sugar land.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksville at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Sugar land.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksville | Sugar land |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (976) | 1.2% (1,314) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (24,180) | 7.3% (7,972) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (9,720) | 4.3% (4,753) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (29,557) | 42.8% (46,851) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Sugar land
- In Sugar land, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.6% in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 7.3% in Sugar land.
- More residents in Clarksville have less than a high school education at 5.5% compared to 4.3% in Sugar land.
- In Sugar land, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.8% compared to 16.7% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.