Demographics details for Clarksville, TN vs Bowman, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, TN vs Bowman, SC.
| Data | Clarksville | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 176,974 | 769 |
| Median Age | 30.1 years | 47.2 years |
| Median Income | $62,688 | $33,250 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 21.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.3 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Bowman
- In Clarksville, the population is higher at 176,974, compared to 769 in Bowman.
- The median age in Bowman is higher at 47.2 years, compared to 30.1 years in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher median income of $62,688 compared to $33,250 in Bowman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clarksville at 36.0% compared to 21.0% in Bowman.
- The poverty level is higher in Bowman at 15%, compared to 12% in Clarksville.
- Bowman has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.3% in Clarksville.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksville vs Bowman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksville | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 22 | 66 |
| White | 55 | 33 |
| Asian | 3 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 11 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Bowman
- In Bowman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 66% compared to 22% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of White residents at 55% compared to 33% in Bowman.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarksville at 3% compared to 0% in Bowman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarksville at 11% compared to 0% in Bowman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarksville at 9% compared to 1% in Bowman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksville and Bowman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksville | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 28.4% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 20.1% | 21.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.8% | 14.3% |
| Obesity | 39.3% | 43.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Bowman
- In Bowman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.6% in Clarksville.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksville at 28.4% compared to 19.3% in Bowman.
- Bowman has a higher smoking rate at 21.8% compared to 20.1% in Clarksville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarksville at 14.8% compared to 14.3% in Bowman.
- Bowman has higher obesity rates at 43.7% compared to 39.3% in Clarksville.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bowman at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Clarksville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksville | Bowman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (976) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (24,180) | 26.4% (203) |
| Less than High School | 5.5% (9,720) | 12.6% (97) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.7% (29,557) | 7.3% (56) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Bowman
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Bowman.
- In Bowman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.4% compared to 13.7% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bowman at 12.6%, compared to 5.5% in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.7% compared to 7.3% in Bowman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.