Demographics details for Clarksville, AR vs Pembroke pines, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, AR vs Pembroke pines, FL.

Data Clarksville Pembroke pines
Population 9,555 169,876
Median Age 35.3 years 42.9 years
Median Income $35,911 $77,657
Married Families 36.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 18% 10%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Pembroke pines

  • The population in Pembroke pines is higher at 169,876, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
  • The median age in Pembroke pines is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
  • Pembroke pines has a higher median income of $77,657, compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
  • In Pembroke pines, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
  • Clarksville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 10% in Pembroke pines.
  • The unemployment rate in Clarksville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Pembroke pines.

Demographics

Demographics Clarksville vs Pembroke pines provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarksville Pembroke pines
Black 3 21
White 60 9
Asian 6 5
Hispanic 23 47
Two or More Races 7 18
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Pembroke pines

  • In Pembroke pines, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
  • Clarksville has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 9% in Pembroke pines.
  • The Asian population is larger in Clarksville at 6% compared to 5% in Pembroke pines.
  • Pembroke pines has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 47%, compared to 23% in Clarksville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pembroke pines at 18%, compared to 7% in Clarksville.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clarksville at 1% compared to 0% in Pembroke pines.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarksville Pembroke pines
Mental Health Not Good 21.0% 14.4%
Physical Health Not Good 16.3% 9.7%
Depression 27.9% 16.0%
Smoking 24.5% 13.7%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 14.8%
Obesity 39.7% 28.3%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Pembroke pines

  • More residents in Clarksville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 14.4% in Pembroke pines.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clarksville at 27.9% compared to 16.0% in Pembroke pines.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksville at 24.5% compared to 13.7% in Pembroke pines.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Pembroke pines at 14.8% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clarksville at 39.7% compared to 28.3% in Pembroke pines.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Pembroke pines.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarksville Pembroke pines
No Schooling 4.2% (402) 1.3% (2,184)
High School Diploma 21.6% (2,064) 18.7% (31,781)
Less than High School 28.6% (2,735) 8.3% (14,103)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.2% (786) 25.9% (43,973)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Pembroke pines

  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.3% in Pembroke pines.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 18.7% in Pembroke pines.
  • More residents in Clarksville have less than a high school education at 28.6% compared to 8.3% in Pembroke pines.
  • In Pembroke pines, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.9% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.