Demographics details for Clarksville, AR vs Huntingdon, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, AR vs Huntingdon, TN.
Data | Clarksville | Huntingdon |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,555 | 4,424 |
Median Age | 35.3 years | 33.4 years |
Median Income | $35,911 | $46,167 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 43.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 14% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Huntingdon
- In Clarksville, the population is higher at 9,555, compared to 4,424 in Huntingdon.
- Residents in Clarksville have a higher median age of 35.3 years compared to 33.4 years in Huntingdon.
- Huntingdon has a higher median income of $46,167, compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- In Huntingdon, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 14% in Huntingdon.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Clarksville and Huntingdon at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksville vs Huntingdon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarksville | Huntingdon |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 15 |
White | 60 | 79 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 23 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 7 | 6 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Huntingdon
- In Huntingdon, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Huntingdon at 79% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarksville at 6% compared to 0% in Huntingdon.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarksville at 23% compared to 0% in Huntingdon.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarksville at 7% compared to 6% in Huntingdon.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clarksville at 1% compared to 0% in Huntingdon.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarksville | Huntingdon |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 20.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 14.3% |
Depression | 27.9% | 28.5% |
Smoking | 24.5% | 23.9% |
Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 37.8% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 26.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Huntingdon
- More residents in Clarksville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 20.2% in Huntingdon.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Huntingdon at 28.5% versus 27.9% in Clarksville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksville at 24.5% compared to 23.9% in Huntingdon.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Huntingdon at 15.1% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksville at 39.7% compared to 37.8% in Huntingdon.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Huntingdon at 26.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarksville | Huntingdon |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.2% (402) | 1.0% (44) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (2,064) | 17.9% (794) |
Less than High School | 28.6% (2,735) | 17.5% (776) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (786) | 16.5% (731) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Huntingdon
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 1.0% in Huntingdon.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 17.9% in Huntingdon.
- More residents in Clarksville have less than a high school education at 28.6% compared to 17.5% in Huntingdon.
- In Huntingdon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.