Demographics details for Clarksville, AR vs Falling waters, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, AR vs Falling waters, WV.

Data Clarksville Falling waters
Population 9,555 2,150
Median Age 35.3 years 32.2 years
Median Income $35,911 $84,038
Married Families 36.0% 29.0%
Poverty Level 18% 9%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.5

Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Falling waters

  • In Clarksville, the population is higher at 9,555, compared to 2,150 in Falling waters.
  • Residents in Clarksville have a higher median age of 35.3 years compared to 32.2 years in Falling waters.
  • Falling waters has a higher median income of $84,038, compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clarksville at 36.0% compared to 29.0% in Falling waters.
  • Clarksville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Falling waters.
  • The unemployment rate in Clarksville is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Falling waters.

Demographics

Demographics Clarksville vs Falling waters provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarksville Falling waters
Black 3 6
White 60 92
Asian 6 Data is updating
Hispanic 23 Data is updating
Two or More Races 7 2
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Falling waters

  • In Falling waters, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Falling waters at 92% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Clarksville at 6% compared to 0% in Falling waters.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clarksville at 23% compared to 0% in Falling waters.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clarksville at 7% compared to 2% in Falling waters.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clarksville at 1% compared to 0% in Falling waters.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarksville Falling waters
Mental Health Not Good 21.0% 18.5%
Physical Health Not Good 16.3% 11.9%
Depression 27.9% 25.7%
Smoking 24.5% 18.7%
Binge Drinking 13.9% 15.2%
Obesity 39.7% 37.6%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 24.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Falling waters

  • More residents in Clarksville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 18.5% in Falling waters.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clarksville at 27.9% compared to 25.7% in Falling waters.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksville at 24.5% compared to 18.7% in Falling waters.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Falling waters at 15.2% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clarksville at 39.7% compared to 37.6% in Falling waters.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Falling waters at 24.0% compared to 20.0% in Clarksville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarksville Falling waters
No Schooling 4.2% (402) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 21.6% (2,064) 22.4% (482)
Less than High School 28.6% (2,735) 4.7% (102)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 8.2% (786) 11.0% (237)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Falling waters

  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.0% in Falling waters.
  • In Falling waters, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.4% compared to 21.6% in Clarksville.
  • More residents in Clarksville have less than a high school education at 28.6% compared to 4.7% in Falling waters.
  • In Falling waters, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.0% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.