Demographics details for Clarksville, AR vs El campo, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, AR vs El campo, TX.
Data | Clarksville | El campo |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,555 | 12,179 |
Median Age | 35.3 years | 35.9 years |
Median Income | $35,911 | $62,667 |
Married Families | 36.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 18% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Clarksville vs El campo
- The population in El campo is higher at 12,179, compared to 9,555 in Clarksville.
- The median age in El campo is higher at 35.9 years, compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- El campo has a higher median income of $62,667, compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- In El campo, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 36.0% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 11% in El campo.
- El campo has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 4.5% in Clarksville.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksville vs El campo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarksville | El campo |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 9 |
White | 60 | 29 |
Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 23 | 52 |
Two or More Races | 7 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs El campo
- In El campo, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 3% in Clarksville.
- Clarksville has a higher percentage of White residents at 60% compared to 29% in El campo.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarksville at 6% compared to 0% in El campo.
- El campo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 52%, compared to 23% in Clarksville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in El campo at 10%, compared to 7% in Clarksville.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clarksville at 1% compared to 0% in El campo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarksville | El campo |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 18.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 14.2% |
Depression | 27.9% | 23.3% |
Smoking | 24.5% | 19.0% |
Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 39.7% | 40.1% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs El campo
- More residents in Clarksville report poor mental health at 21.0% compared to 18.5% in El campo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksville at 27.9% compared to 23.3% in El campo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksville at 24.5% compared to 19.0% in El campo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in El campo at 16.9% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- El campo has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 39.7% in Clarksville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksville at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in El campo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarksville | El campo |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 4.2% (402) | 2.3% (277) |
High School Diploma | 21.6% (2,064) | 14.5% (1,760) |
Less than High School | 28.6% (2,735) | 28.8% (3,510) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (786) | 10.2% (1,240) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs El campo
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 2.3% in El campo.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 14.5% in El campo.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in El campo at 28.8%, compared to 28.6% in Clarksville.
- In El campo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.2% compared to 8.2% in Clarksville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.