Demographics details for Clarksville, AR vs Baxter, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksville, AR vs Baxter, TN.
| Data | Clarksville | Baxter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,555 | 1,836 |
| Median Age | 35.3 years | 36.4 years |
| Median Income | $35,911 | $57,829 |
| Married Families | 36.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 18% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Clarksville vs Baxter
- In Clarksville, the population is higher at 9,555, compared to 1,836 in Baxter.
- The median age in Baxter is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 35.3 years in Clarksville.
- Baxter has a higher median income of $57,829, compared to $35,911 in Clarksville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Clarksville at 36.0% compared to 32.0% in Baxter.
- Clarksville has a higher poverty level at 18% compared to 9% in Baxter.
- Baxter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Clarksville.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksville vs Baxter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksville | Baxter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 2 |
| White | 60 | 92 |
| Asian | 6 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 7 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksville vs Baxter
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksville at 3% compared to 2% in Baxter.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Baxter at 92% compared to 60% in Clarksville.
- The Asian population is larger in Clarksville at 6% compared to 0% in Baxter.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Clarksville at 23% compared to 2% in Baxter.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarksville at 7% compared to 4% in Baxter.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Clarksville at 1% compared to 0% in Baxter.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksville | Baxter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.0% | 21.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 27.9% | 31.3% |
| Smoking | 24.5% | 26.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.9% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 39.7% | 36.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksville vs Baxter
- In Baxter, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.8% compared to 21.0% in Clarksville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Baxter at 31.3% versus 27.9% in Clarksville.
- Baxter has a higher smoking rate at 26.6% compared to 24.5% in Clarksville.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Baxter at 14.7% compared to 13.9% in Clarksville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksville at 39.7% compared to 36.5% in Baxter.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Clarksville and Baxter at 20.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksville | Baxter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 4.2% (402) | 0.2% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (2,064) | 22.7% (416) |
| Less than High School | 28.6% (2,735) | 9.7% (178) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 8.2% (786) | 5.6% (103) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksville vs Baxter
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville have no formal schooling at 4.2% compared to 0.2% in Baxter.
- In Baxter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.7% compared to 21.6% in Clarksville.
- More residents in Clarksville have less than a high school education at 28.6% compared to 9.7% in Baxter.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 8.2% compared to 5.6% in Baxter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.