Demographics details for Clarksdale, MS vs Silverhill, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksdale, MS vs Silverhill, AL.
| Data | Clarksdale | Silverhill |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,969 | 1,369 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 43.0 years |
| Median Income | $35,377 | $58,510 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 27% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Clarksdale vs Silverhill
- In Clarksdale, the population is higher at 13,969, compared to 1,369 in Silverhill.
- The median age in Silverhill is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
- Silverhill has a higher median income of $58,510, compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- In Silverhill, the percentage of married families is higher at 26.0%, compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 10% in Silverhill.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksdale is higher at 6.9%, compared to 3.5% in Silverhill.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksdale vs Silverhill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksdale | Silverhill |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 86 | Data is updating |
| White | 9 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Silverhill
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksdale at 86% compared to 0% in Silverhill.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Silverhill at 90% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- Both Clarksdale and Silverhill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Silverhill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarksdale at 3% compared to 2% in Silverhill.
- In Silverhill, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarksdale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksdale | Silverhill |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 24.9% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Silverhill
- More residents in Clarksdale report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 18.7% in Silverhill.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Silverhill at 24.9% versus 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksdale at 25.2% compared to 17.6% in Silverhill.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Silverhill at 17.7% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksdale at 50.5% compared to 38.2% in Silverhill.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 6.0% in Silverhill.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksdale | Silverhill |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (274) | 2.0% (28) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (1,281) | 10.1% (138) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (2,130) | 5.4% (74) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (1,964) | 11.5% (157) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksdale vs Silverhill
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clarksdale and Silverhill at 2.0%.
- In Silverhill, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 10.1% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents in Clarksdale have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 5.4% in Silverhill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 11.5% in Silverhill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.