Demographics details for Clarksdale, MS vs Rutherford, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksdale, MS vs Rutherford, NJ.
| Data | Clarksdale | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,969 | 18,662 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 40.5 years |
| Median Income | $35,377 | $128,576 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 27% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Clarksdale vs Rutherford
- The population in Rutherford is higher at 18,662, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- The median age in Rutherford is higher at 40.5 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576, compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- In Rutherford, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksdale is higher at 6.9%, compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksdale vs Rutherford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksdale | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 86 | 3 |
| White | 9 | 49 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 16 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Rutherford
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksdale at 86% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rutherford at 49% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- In Rutherford, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 0% in Clarksdale.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 21%, compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Rutherford at 11%, compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksdale and Rutherford at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksdale | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 13.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 10.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 24.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Rutherford
- More residents in Clarksdale report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksdale at 20.8% compared to 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksdale at 25.2% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksdale at 50.5% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksdale | Rutherford |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (274) | 0.9% (161) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (1,281) | 12.4% (2,318) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (2,130) | 6.3% (1,175) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (1,964) | 38.9% (7,259) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksdale vs Rutherford
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksdale have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.9% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.4% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents in Clarksdale have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- In Rutherford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.