Demographics details for Clarksdale, MS vs Oakland park, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksdale, MS vs Oakland park, FL.
| Data | Clarksdale | Oakland park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,969 | 43,824 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 39.1 years |
| Median Income | $35,377 | $64,989 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 27% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Clarksdale vs Oakland park
- The population in Oakland park is higher at 43,824, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- The median age in Oakland park is higher at 39.1 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
- Oakland park has a higher median income of $64,989, compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- In Oakland park, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 14% in Oakland park.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksdale is higher at 6.9%, compared to 3.1% in Oakland park.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksdale vs Oakland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksdale | Oakland park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 86 | 29 |
| White | 9 | 20 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 32 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 17 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Oakland park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksdale at 86% compared to 29% in Oakland park.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Oakland park at 20% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- In Oakland park, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clarksdale.
- Oakland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakland park at 17%, compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksdale and Oakland park at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksdale | Oakland park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 17.8% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 20.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 31.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Oakland park
- More residents in Clarksdale report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 16.3% in Oakland park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksdale at 20.8% compared to 17.8% in Oakland park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksdale at 25.2% compared to 20.1% in Oakland park.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Oakland park at 15.0% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksdale at 50.5% compared to 31.1% in Oakland park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Oakland park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksdale | Oakland park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (274) | 1.4% (596) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (1,281) | 19.8% (8,695) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (2,130) | 16.2% (7,092) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (1,964) | 20.7% (9,073) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksdale vs Oakland park
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksdale have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 1.4% in Oakland park.
- In Oakland park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakland park at 16.2%, compared to 15.2% in Clarksdale.
- In Oakland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.