Demographics details for Clarksdale, MS vs Clayton, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksdale, MS vs Clayton, NC.
| Data | Clarksdale | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 13,969 | 29,445 |
| Median Age | 35.4 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $35,377 | $71,698 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 27% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Clarksdale vs Clayton
- The population in Clayton is higher at 29,445, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- Residents in Clarksdale have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
- Clayton has a higher median income of $71,698, compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 5% in Clayton.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksdale is higher at 6.9%, compared to 3.7% in Clayton.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksdale vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksdale | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 86 | 22 |
| White | 9 | 59 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 13 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksdale at 86% compared to 22% in Clayton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Clayton at 59% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- In Clayton, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Clarksdale.
- Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksdale and Clayton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksdale | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 10.4% |
| Depression | 20.8% | 23.1% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 15.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 50.5% | 39.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Clayton
- More residents in Clarksdale report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 15.6% in Clayton.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksdale at 25.2% compared to 15.2% in Clayton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksdale at 50.5% compared to 39.9% in Clayton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 10.0% in Clayton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksdale | Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.0% (274) | 0.7% (210) |
| High School Diploma | 9.2% (1,281) | 12.6% (3,700) |
| Less than High School | 15.2% (2,130) | 5.4% (1,598) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (1,964) | 18.6% (5,471) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksdale vs Clayton
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksdale have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
- More residents in Clarksdale have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 5.4% in Clayton.
- In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.