Demographics details for Clarksdale, MS vs Cedar grove, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarksdale, MS vs Cedar grove, WV.

Data Clarksdale Cedar grove
Population 13,969 693
Median Age 35.4 years 44.3 years
Median Income $35,377 $55,600
Married Families 20.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 27% 12%
Unemployment Rate 6.9 4.5

Population Comparison: Clarksdale vs Cedar grove

  • In Clarksdale, the population is higher at 13,969, compared to 693 in Cedar grove.
  • The median age in Cedar grove is higher at 44.3 years, compared to 35.4 years in Clarksdale.
  • Cedar grove has a higher median income of $55,600, compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
  • In Cedar grove, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
  • Clarksdale has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 12% in Cedar grove.
  • The unemployment rate in Clarksdale is higher at 6.9%, compared to 4.5% in Cedar grove.

Demographics

Demographics Clarksdale vs Cedar grove provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarksdale Cedar grove
Black 86 Data is updating
White 9 98
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 Data is updating
Two or More Races 3 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Cedar grove

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksdale at 86% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar grove at 98% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
  • Both Clarksdale and Cedar grove have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Clarksdale at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar grove.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Clarksdale at 3% compared to 2% in Cedar grove.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksdale and Cedar grove at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarksdale Cedar grove
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 22.3%
Physical Health Not Good 15.8% 15.7%
Depression 20.8% 30.1%
Smoking 25.2% 24.6%
Binge Drinking 11.1% 13.9%
Obesity 50.5% 40.4%
Disability Percentage 19.0% 20.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Cedar grove

  • In Cedar grove, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 22.3% compared to 19.3% in Clarksdale.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar grove at 30.1% versus 20.8% in Clarksdale.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksdale at 25.2% compared to 24.6% in Cedar grove.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar grove at 13.9% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Clarksdale at 50.5% compared to 40.4% in Cedar grove.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cedar grove at 20.0% compared to 19.0% in Clarksdale.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarksdale Cedar grove
No Schooling 2.0% (274) 0.6% (4)
High School Diploma 9.2% (1,281) 21.2% (147)
Less than High School 15.2% (2,130) 18.5% (128)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 14.1% (1,964) 2.3% (16)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarksdale vs Cedar grove

  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarksdale have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.6% in Cedar grove.
  • In Cedar grove, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.2% compared to 9.2% in Clarksdale.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cedar grove at 18.5%, compared to 15.2% in Clarksdale.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarksdale hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.1% compared to 2.3% in Cedar grove.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.