Demographics details for Clarksdale, MS vs Bellingham, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksdale, MS vs Bellingham, WA.
Data | Clarksdale | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
Population | 13,969 | 93,896 |
Median Age | 35.4 years | 33.7 years |
Median Income | $35,377 | $64,026 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 27% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 6.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Clarksdale vs Bellingham
- The population in Bellingham is higher at 93,896, compared to 13,969 in Clarksdale.
- Residents in Clarksdale have a higher median age of 35.4 years compared to 33.7 years in Bellingham.
- Bellingham has a higher median income of $64,026, compared to $35,377 in Clarksdale.
- In Bellingham, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 20.0% in Clarksdale.
- Clarksdale has a higher poverty level at 27% compared to 11% in Bellingham.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksdale is higher at 6.9%, compared to 4.5% in Bellingham.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksdale vs Bellingham provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Clarksdale | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
Black | 86 | 1 |
White | 9 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 3 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Bellingham
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarksdale at 86% compared to 1% in Bellingham.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Bellingham at 74% compared to 9% in Clarksdale.
- In Bellingham, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Clarksdale.
- Bellingham has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Clarksdale.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bellingham at 8%, compared to 3% in Clarksdale.
- In Bellingham, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarksdale.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Clarksdale | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 17.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.8% | 10.9% |
Depression | 20.8% | 30.0% |
Smoking | 25.2% | 14.1% |
Binge Drinking | 11.1% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 50.5% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksdale vs Bellingham
- More residents in Clarksdale report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.6% in Bellingham.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bellingham at 30.0% versus 20.8% in Clarksdale.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksdale at 25.2% compared to 14.1% in Bellingham.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Bellingham at 17.3% compared to 11.1% in Clarksdale.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksdale at 50.5% compared to 25.6% in Bellingham.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksdale at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Bellingham.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Clarksdale | Bellingham |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.0% (274) | 0.5% (454) |
High School Diploma | 9.2% (1,281) | 8.8% (8,220) |
Less than High School | 15.2% (2,130) | 6.2% (5,781) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.1% (1,964) | 28.9% (27,095) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksdale vs Bellingham
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksdale have no formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.5% in Bellingham.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksdale hold a high school diploma at 9.2% compared to 8.8% in Bellingham.
- More residents in Clarksdale have less than a high school education at 15.2% compared to 6.2% in Bellingham.
- In Bellingham, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.9% compared to 14.1% in Clarksdale.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.