Demographics details for Clarksburg, WV vs Jurupa valley, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksburg, WV vs Jurupa valley, CA.
| Data | Clarksburg | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,647 | 107,609 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $46,595 | $91,562 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Clarksburg vs Jurupa valley
- The population in Jurupa valley is higher at 107,609, compared to 15,647 in Clarksburg.
- Residents in Clarksburg have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 33.5 years in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher median income of $91,562, compared to $46,595 in Clarksburg.
- In Jurupa valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 32.0% in Clarksburg.
- Clarksburg has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 12% in Jurupa valley.
- Jurupa valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.2% in Clarksburg.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksburg vs Jurupa valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksburg | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 3 |
| White | 90 | 8 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 71 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 13 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksburg vs Jurupa valley
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Clarksburg and Jurupa valley at 3%.
- Clarksburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 8% in Jurupa valley.
- In Jurupa valley, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Clarksburg.
- Jurupa valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 71%, compared to 2% in Clarksburg.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jurupa valley at 13%, compared to 5% in Clarksburg.
- In Jurupa valley, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarksburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksburg | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 29.2% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 25.6% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.1% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 38.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksburg vs Jurupa valley
- More residents in Clarksburg report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 16.7% in Jurupa valley.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksburg at 29.2% compared to 17.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksburg at 25.6% compared to 14.6% in Jurupa valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jurupa valley at 16.1% compared to 13.1% in Clarksburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksburg at 39.9% compared to 38.4% in Jurupa valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksburg at 20.0% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksburg | Jurupa valley |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (64) | 3.1% (3,376) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (3,327) | 17.3% (18,582) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (3,357) | 34.3% (36,892) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (2,584) | 9.0% (9,706) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksburg vs Jurupa valley
- In Jurupa valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 0.4% in Clarksburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksburg hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 17.3% in Jurupa valley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Jurupa valley at 34.3%, compared to 21.5% in Clarksburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 9.0% in Jurupa valley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.