Demographics details for Clarksburg, WV vs Jefferson, MD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarksburg, WV vs Jefferson, MD.
| Data | Clarksburg | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 15,647 | 2,742 |
| Median Age | 39.7 years | 41.4 years |
| Median Income | $46,595 | $137,667 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 16% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Clarksburg vs Jefferson
- In Clarksburg, the population is higher at 15,647, compared to 2,742 in Jefferson.
- The median age in Jefferson is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 39.7 years in Clarksburg.
- Jefferson has a higher median income of $137,667, compared to $46,595 in Clarksburg.
- In Jefferson, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 32.0% in Clarksburg.
- Clarksburg has a higher poverty level at 16% compared to 0% in Jefferson.
- The unemployment rate in Clarksburg is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.2% in Jefferson.
Demographics
Demographics Clarksburg vs Jefferson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarksburg | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 6 |
| White | 90 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarksburg vs Jefferson
- In Jefferson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Clarksburg.
- Clarksburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 82% in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Clarksburg.
- Jefferson has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 2% in Clarksburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Clarksburg at 5% compared to 4% in Jefferson.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarksburg and Jefferson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarksburg | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 21.1% | 14.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 29.2% | 20.4% |
| Smoking | 25.6% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 13.1% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 39.9% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksburg vs Jefferson
- More residents in Clarksburg report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 14.8% in Jefferson.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarksburg at 29.2% compared to 20.4% in Jefferson.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksburg at 25.6% compared to 12.6% in Jefferson.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Jefferson at 17.8% compared to 13.1% in Clarksburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarksburg at 39.9% compared to 32.1% in Jefferson.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarksburg at 20.0% compared to 11.0% in Jefferson.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarksburg | Jefferson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (64) | 0.4% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 21.3% (3,327) | 18.8% (516) |
| Less than High School | 21.5% (3,357) | 2.3% (62) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.5% (2,584) | 27.4% (751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarksburg vs Jefferson
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Clarksburg and Jefferson at 0.4%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarksburg hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 18.8% in Jefferson.
- More residents in Clarksburg have less than a high school education at 21.5% compared to 2.3% in Jefferson.
- In Jefferson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.4% compared to 16.5% in Clarksburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.