Demographics details for Clarksburg, WV vs Davisboro, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Clarksburg, WV vs Davisboro, GA.

Data Clarksburg Davisboro
Population 15,647 1,906
Median Age 39.7 years 37.5 years
Median Income $46,595 $45,647
Married Families 32.0% 17.0%
Poverty Level 16% 22%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Clarksburg vs Davisboro

  • In Clarksburg, the population is higher at 15,647, compared to 1,906 in Davisboro.
  • Residents in Clarksburg have a higher median age of 39.7 years compared to 37.5 years in Davisboro.
  • Clarksburg has a higher median income of $46,595 compared to $45,647 in Davisboro.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Clarksburg at 32.0% compared to 17.0% in Davisboro.
  • The poverty level is higher in Davisboro at 22%, compared to 16% in Clarksburg.
  • The unemployment rate in Clarksburg is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Davisboro.

Demographics

Demographics Clarksburg vs Davisboro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Clarksburg Davisboro
Black 3 74
White 90 12
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 2 8
Two or More Races 5 5
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Clarksburg vs Davisboro

  • In Davisboro, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 74% compared to 3% in Clarksburg.
  • Clarksburg has a higher percentage of White residents at 90% compared to 12% in Davisboro.
  • Both Clarksburg and Davisboro have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Davisboro has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 2% in Clarksburg.
  • Both Clarksburg and Davisboro have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 5%.
  • In Davisboro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Clarksburg.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Clarksburg Davisboro
Mental Health Not Good 21.1% 16.2%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 14.5%
Depression 29.2% 16.2%
Smoking 25.6% 23.6%
Binge Drinking 13.1% 16.3%
Obesity 39.9% 43.3%
Disability Percentage 20.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Clarksburg vs Davisboro

  • More residents in Clarksburg report poor mental health at 21.1% compared to 16.2% in Davisboro.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Clarksburg at 29.2% compared to 16.2% in Davisboro.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Clarksburg at 25.6% compared to 23.6% in Davisboro.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Davisboro at 16.3% compared to 13.1% in Clarksburg.
  • Davisboro has higher obesity rates at 43.3% compared to 39.9% in Clarksburg.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Clarksburg at 20.0% compared to 5.0% in Davisboro.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Clarksburg Davisboro
No Schooling 0.4% (64) 1.1% (21)
High School Diploma 21.3% (3,327) 17.7% (338)
Less than High School 21.5% (3,357) 36.0% (686)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 16.5% (2,584) 5.0% (95)

Education Levels Comparison: Clarksburg vs Davisboro

  • In Davisboro, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.4% in Clarksburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarksburg hold a high school diploma at 21.3% compared to 17.7% in Davisboro.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Davisboro at 36.0%, compared to 21.5% in Clarksburg.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Clarksburg hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.5% compared to 5.0% in Davisboro.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.