Demographics details for Clarks hill, SC vs Newark, NJ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarks hill, SC vs Newark, NJ.
| Data | Clarks hill | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78 | 305,344 |
| Median Age | 68.4 years | 34.7 years |
| Median Income | $26,500 | $46,460 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 7.8 |
Population Comparison: Clarks hill vs Newark
- The population in Newark is higher at 305,344, compared to 78 in Clarks hill.
- Residents in Clarks hill have a higher median age of 68.4 years compared to 34.7 years in Newark.
- Newark has a higher median income of $46,460, compared to $26,500 in Clarks hill.
- In Newark, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clarks hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Newark at 30%, compared to 0% in Clarks hill.
- Newark has a higher unemployment rate at 7.8% compared to 5.5% in Clarks hill.
Demographics
Demographics Clarks hill vs Newark provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarks hill | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 79 | 47 |
| White | 21 | 3 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 37 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarks hill vs Newark
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarks hill at 79% compared to 47% in Newark.
- Clarks hill has a higher percentage of White residents at 21% compared to 3% in Newark.
- In Newark, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Clarks hill.
- Newark has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 0% in Clarks hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Newark at 11%, compared to 0% in Clarks hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarks hill and Newark at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarks hill | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 14.8% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 18.2% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 19.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 13.9% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 42.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarks hill vs Newark
- More residents in Clarks hill report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 17.1% in Newark.
- Depression is more prevalent in Clarks hill at 18.3% compared to 18.2% in Newark.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarks hill at 21.7% compared to 19.5% in Newark.
- Binge drinking is more common in Clarks hill at 14.1% compared to 13.9% in Newark.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarks hill at 40.4% compared to 38.5% in Newark.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarks hill at 42.0% compared to 16.0% in Newark.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarks hill | Newark |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.5% (7,516) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (16) | 21.9% (66,812) |
| Less than High School | 32.1% (25) | 24.1% (73,461) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (6) | 11.1% (33,938) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarks hill vs Newark
- In Newark, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 0.0% in Clarks hill.
- In Newark, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.9% compared to 20.5% in Clarks hill.
- More residents in Clarks hill have less than a high school education at 32.1% compared to 24.1% in Newark.
- In Newark, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.1% compared to 7.7% in Clarks hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.