Demographics details for Clarks hill, SC vs Folsom, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Clarks hill, SC vs Folsom, PA.
| Data | Clarks hill | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 78 | 8,535 |
| Median Age | 68.4 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $26,500 | $95,048 |
| Married Families | 19.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Clarks hill vs Folsom
- The population in Folsom is higher at 8,535, compared to 78 in Clarks hill.
- Residents in Clarks hill have a higher median age of 68.4 years compared to 37.5 years in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $95,048, compared to $26,500 in Clarks hill.
- In Folsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 19.0% in Clarks hill.
- The poverty level is higher in Folsom at 5%, compared to 0% in Clarks hill.
- The unemployment rate in Clarks hill is higher at 5.5%, compared to 3.6% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Clarks hill vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Clarks hill | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 79 | 5 |
| White | 21 | 89 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 4 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 2 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Clarks hill vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Clarks hill at 79% compared to 5% in Folsom.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Folsom at 89% compared to 21% in Clarks hill.
- Both Clarks hill and Folsom have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Folsom has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 0% in Clarks hill.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Folsom at 2%, compared to 0% in Clarks hill.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Clarks hill and Folsom at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Clarks hill | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.6% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.4% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 18.3% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 16.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.1% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 40.4% | 31.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 42.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Clarks hill vs Folsom
- More residents in Clarks hill report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.5% in Folsom.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Folsom at 22.1% versus 18.3% in Clarks hill.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Clarks hill at 21.7% compared to 16.1% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 18.5% compared to 14.1% in Clarks hill.
- Obesity rates are higher in Clarks hill at 40.4% compared to 31.2% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Clarks hill at 42.0% compared to 10.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Clarks hill | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (71) |
| High School Diploma | 20.5% (16) | 19.2% (1,635) |
| Less than High School | 32.1% (25) | 10.1% (860) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (6) | 20.5% (1,751) |
Education Levels Comparison: Clarks hill vs Folsom
- In Folsom, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Clarks hill.
- A higher percentage of residents in Clarks hill hold a high school diploma at 20.5% compared to 19.2% in Folsom.
- More residents in Clarks hill have less than a high school education at 32.1% compared to 10.1% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.5% compared to 7.7% in Clarks hill.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.